What Is It Known For?
The St. Louis School of Phlebotomy is part of a network that began with the Ohio School of Phlebotomy, founded in June 2009 to provide accessible healthcare career training. The St. Louis location opened in August 2013, and today, the network includes nine schools across the U.S. All locations share the same goal: to offer thorough, hands-on phlebotomy training programs that prepare students for careers in healthcare.
While the school does not publish specific enrollment numbers, it emphasizes small class sizes to provide personalized attention to each student. For more details about enrollment or programs, reaching out directly to the school is recommended.
Degrees & Certifications
The St. Louis School of Phlebotomy offers specialized programs and hands-on workshops to prepare students for healthcare careers. Programs include:
- Phlebotomy
- 4-Week Accelerated Phlebotomy
- Clinical Medical Assisting
- EKG Technician course
- Clinical Laboratory Assisting
These programs result in certificates or diplomas and vary in length, from 4 weeks for accelerated courses to several months for more in-depth training. The school also provides hands-on workshops, which can take a few hours to complete, giving students practical skills for their future careers.
Class Schedules
All classes at the St. Louis School of Phlebotomy are held on-site, with no online or evening options available. Classes are typically scheduled during morning or afternoon hours. To enhance learning, the school partners with clinical laboratories and hospitals to offer externships as part of the Phlebotomy program. This real-world experience helps students gain valuable skills in professional healthcare settings.
Is It a Good School?
Yes, the St. Louis School of Phlebotomy is a reputable choice for healthcare training. While the school does not mention institutional accreditation, many of its individual programs are accredited by relevant organizations. For specific details about program accreditation, contact the school directly.
Acceptance Rate
The school does not publish an acceptance rate. However, it has minimum entry requirements for enrollment. Prospective students should review these requirements before applying to ensure they meet the criteria.
How Much Does Tuition Cost?
Kansas City School of Phlebotomy provides affordable tuition rates for students pursuing careers in healthcare. Program costs are as follows:
- Phlebotomy Program: $500
- 4-Week Accelerated Phlebotomy Program: $500
- Clinical Laboratory Assisting: $500
- EKG Technician Course: $500
- Clinical Medical Assisting Program: $1,000
The school does not offer a net price calculator. For a complete breakdown of tuition, fees, and payment options, contact the school directly.
Programs & Courses
Healthcare
- Phlebotomy
- Clinical Medical Assisting
- EKG Technician
- Clinical Laboratory Assisting
- CPR
- IV Infusion
- Paramedical Examiner
Campus Locations
St. Louis 6717 Vernon Ave. St. Louis, MO 63130
Reviews
Based on local Google reviews, St. Louis School of Phlebotomy is viewed as a school with a dedicated teaching staff that provides an effective, hands-on, accelerated curriculum, but its reputation is consistently marred by severe, recurring operational failures and poor administrative communication.
Overall Score: 4.0/5 Stars
Common Praises
Exceptional and Engaging Instructors: The most consistent and enthusiastic praise is for the quality of the instructors. They are described as “wonderful,” “the best teacher ever,” very knowledgeable, detailed, and hands-on. They make the class “fun,” “easy for us to learn,” and effective in preparing students for the national certification exam.
Effective, Accelerated Curriculum: Students value the short, focused, accelerated courses (like the four-week class) for providing the necessary knowledge and hands-on practice (including starting venipuncture early) to pass the national certification exam quickly.
Supportive Director and Career Assistance: The school director is personally mentioned multiple times for being “amazing,” helpful, and even setting up a new clinical contract for a student. Alumni also note that the school assists with resumes and job searches, which is appreciated.
Successful Certification Outcomes: Students frequently mention passing the national certification exam, which confirms the quality of the instruction.
Common Criticisms
Severe Communication and Organizational Failures: This is the primary source of negative reviews. Students report that the school is “very unprofessional,” staff “never answer the phone like ever,” and they are greeted with “rude customer service” when they do reach someone.
Unreliable Class Scheduling and Cancellations: Reviews cite multiple instances of last-minute cancellations of paid-for classes—sometimes just the day before—due to issues like instructor availability. The school also failed to notify students of class cancellations or enrollment denials after deposits were paid.
Delayed/Missing Credentials: Students have complained about emailing and calling multiple times without a response to try and receive their certificate of completion after class has ended.
Inconsistent Resource Availability and Facilities: Some reviews mention that the school does not always have the necessary supplies. Older reviews note that the building “could use updating” and that parking is difficult, though students concede the education was still worth it.
Enrollment and Payment Issues: Multiple reviewers reported being denied enrollment or having classes canceled even after paying a deposit, with one instance where the school claimed they couldn’t find the paid deposit.
Momentum
The momentum is starkly divided. On one hand, the quality of instruction remains high, evidenced by positive, specific praise for multiple instructors over several years and student success on certification exams. On the other hand, the administrative failures (communication, cancellations, and organization) are recurring, severe, and recent. The owner frequently responds to these negative reviews, acknowledging the issues and attempting to resolve them (e.g., processing refunds), which demonstrates awareness of the problems, but the continued frequency of the complaints suggests these operational failures have yet to be consistently fixed.